SUPERSTITION
By William Lyon Phelps
The best definition of superstition that I can remember
was made by James Russell Lowell." Superstition, by which I mean the
respecting of that which we are told to respect rather than that which is
respectable in itself." Mental slavery is always degrading; and
superstition is a form of slavery, because the mind is subjected to fear. As
Notoriety is the bastard sister of Reputation, so Superstition is the bastard
sister of Religion. The difference between the two can be easily and simply
expressed, but it is literally all the difference in the world. The most elevating
influence known to man is Religion; the least elevating is Superstition.
The
instinctive pessimism of humanity is shown in many careless phrases such as
"It's too good to be true." The majority of men and women believe
that hopes are illusory, but fears accurately foretell the coming event. Yet
any sensible old man or old woman will tell us that nearly all the fears and
worries from which they themselves suffered almost daily during a long life
really never materialised. They suffered for nothing. We learn little from
their experience, but go on our way filled with apprehension and alarm.
Shakespeare said the brave man dies only once, but cowards die a thousand times
in fearing death. I suppose most of us are cowards. Although we are still in
good enough health to carry on, we have already died of cancer, tuberculosis,
and many other diseases.
Many social
superstitions were cured by that great turning point in history, the French
Revolution. The world has never been quite the same since the year 1789.
Before that date, people really believed that those who were born in noble and
royal families were superior to the common herd; after that date the nobility
still believed it, but the common people did not agree. They found they had
been respecting that which they had been told to respect, rather than that
which is respectable in itself. A Frenchman remarked, "The great appear
to us great because we are kneeling let us rise." In 1789 everybody stood up.
It is foolish to respect any person or any institution
unless it is respectable. The religion
of many unenlightened people seems to be based largely on fear, in which case it is of course not religion at all, but rank superstition.
James Whitcomb Riley told me of a remark made by a small boy to his mother at
bedtime. He jumped into bed, and to the question of his mother, "What,
aren't you going to say your prayers?" the child answered, "No, I
ain't going to say my prayers tonight, and I ain't going to say 'em tomorrow
night, nor the next night. And then if nothing happens, I ain't ever going to
say 'em again."
This
all-too-typical boy looked upon prayer as a means of warding off danger, and he
was sufficiently intelligent and sufficiently brave to risk its omission. But
if he had been brought up to believe that prayer is neither a charm against
peril nor a method of getting what you want, that prayer was intimate communion
with a Divine Friend, he would have looked upon it from a different point of
view. George Meredith told his
son never to ask any material thing from God, but to pray to Him every day of
his life.
Now many
men and women have the religious maturity of a small boy, which is infinitely
worse than having the religion of a little child. They never pray except when
they are in danger, or when they think they are going into danger, or when they
have suffered from some calamity. That is like speaking to a friend only when
you want to borrow money. The profound
wisdom of mysticism consists not in making use of God, but in hoping and
believing that God will make some use of us.
The
base-born idea that God is against us is accompanied by the idea that He may be
placated or humoured. In Richard Halliburton's exciting account of his
adventures in southern countries, he tells us how the pagan priests used to
sacrifice thousands of young maidens to their deity. It would seem, looking back on history, that the more
abominable the religion, the fewer the atheists. Every sensible person in those
countries ought to have been an atheist.
Now
although many "enlightened" people today laugh at the terrible fears
and even more terrible remedies of those intellectual slaves, they themselves
are not very much wiser. It is highly probable that the majority of Americans
today would not dare to say "I haven't had a bad cold this winter"
without touching wood. Some of them
might grin as they touched it, but they would touch it just the same. Such a gesture is intellectually and morally
contemptible.
But many
are even poorer in brains. For many would not dare to say that they had not had
a cold this winter, with or without wood in reach. They believe that if you
express anything pleasant, you will soon
"get your comeuppance." God seems to lie in wait for us, and the
moment we seem satisfied or happy or even prominent, He will teach us who is
running the show. The best thing
therefore is never to appear too happy. For many, who have been foolish enough
to say aloud, "I haven't had a cold this winter," wake up the next
morning snuffling. "Now you see
what I've got! If I'd only had sense
enough to keep my mouth shut, I would have been all right. But of course I had to brag about it!"
The most
degrading of all superstitions is the belief that God can be placated,
appeased, or diverted, as we humour a refractory boy or a drunken man. This
abominable idea sometimes takes an extremely tragic form, as when the Indian
mother throws her own baby into the Ganges. "Now, God, you've got to be
good to me! I've given you the best thing I had!"
Sometimes
it takes a merely silly form, as when one gives up some pleasant little luxury;
not with the great idea of drawing nearer to God by removing an obstacle, but
with the absurd idea of bargaining with Him.